Prospect research & wealth screening · head to head
Kindsight (iWave) vs WealthEngine
Kindsight (iWave) and WealthEngine are both prospect research & wealth screening tools. Kindsight (iWave) fits shops that want repeatable wealth screening and prospect scoring at scale; WealthEngine fits wealth-indicator modeling and fast capacity estimates across large lists. The table below lines up price, free tier, and fit so you can see which one matches your shop.
| Kindsight (iWave) | WealthEngine | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Reported from ~$4,150/yr (quoted per organization) | Quoted per organization (reported from ~$5,000/yr) |
| Pricing model | Annual subscription by seats and screening volume | Annual subscription by seats, plus implementation |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Best for | Shops that want repeatable wealth screening and prospect scoring at scale | Wealth-indicator modeling and fast capacity estimates across large lists |
| Last verified | Jul 2026 | Jul 2026 |
Kindsight (iWave)
Strengths: Deep wealth and philanthropic data with transparent, sourced scores; Screens whole lists at once, the pre-campaign workhorse; Top satisfaction ratings in its category on major review sites.
Watch for: Pricing is quoted per organization; entry reportedly starts around $4,150/yr; Capacity data tells you who can give, not who will; Below roughly $1M raised, most shops can't put the results to work.
WealthEngine
Strengths: Strong wealth-indicator modeling and fast capacity estimates; Built for large-list screening and broad segmentation; Prebuilt profiles speed up individual look-ups.
Watch for: No public pricing; reported figures start around $5,000/yr plus implementation; Weighted toward wealth signals; pair with giving-history data before acting; Trails Kindsight and DonorSearch in review-site satisfaction.